Skip to content
No results
  • Engineer Environment Leaks
    • Direction Leak
    • Hiring Leak
    • Skill Leak
    • Energy Leak
    • Psychological Leak
    • Focus Leak
    • Collaboration Leak
    • Dependency Leak
be

ByteEntropy

  • Engineer Environment Leaks
    • Direction Leak
    • Hiring Leak
    • Skill Leak
    • Energy Leak
    • Psychological Leak
    • Focus Leak
    • Collaboration Leak
    • Dependency Leak
be

ByteEntropy

The Safety Leak | Article 4: The Feedback Risk

I used to believe that “Radical Candor” was the silver bullet for engineering performance. I told my team to “be direct,” “don’t sugarcoat it,” and “challenge directly.” I thought I was building a culture of high standards. I was actually…

Read MoreThe Safety Leak | Article 4: The Feedback Risk

The Safety Leak | Article 3: The Consensus Theater

I used to think a meeting where everyone nodded was a successful one. I took the lack of friction as a sign of high-velocity alignment. I was wrong. I’ve realized that most of those meetings were just Consensus Theater. Consensus Theater…

Read MoreThe Safety Leak | Article 3: The Consensus Theater

The Safety Leak | Article 2: The Status Filter

I’ve realized that my job title is often a silencer. The higher I climb in the org chart, the more my opinions act as a throttle on the ideas around me. I call this The Status Filter. It is the invisible…

Read MoreThe Safety Leak | Article 2: The Status Filter

The Safety Leak | Article 1: The Blame Gradient

I’ve learned that the fastest way to kill my team’s telemetry is to treat a technical failure as a character flaw. When a production incident happens, my human instinct is to find the “who.” I want to know whose hands…

Read MoreThe Safety Leak | Article 1: The Blame Gradient

The Safety Leak | Article 0: The Logic of the Leak

I see it constantly in engineering organizations: I hire high-agency, experienced people and then place them in environments that act as a high-pass filter for reality. There is no “No Dissent” policy. I don’t put a slide in the onboarding…

Read MoreThe Safety Leak | Article 0: The Logic of the Leak

The Focus Leak | The Final Audit: The $1M Mistake

We have identified ten distinct leaks throughout this series. But to fix them, leadership must stop viewing them as “developer complaints” and start viewing them as operational waste. To do that, we have to look at the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) of…

Read MoreThe Focus Leak | The Final Audit: The $1M Mistake

The Focus Leak | Article 9: The Requirement Drift

Engineers are hired to build a specific architecture, but they are often forced to move the foundation while the concrete is still pouring. While the “Feedback Lag” (Article 8) is about waiting, Requirement Drift is about the mid-flight pivot that acts as a “Force…

Read MoreThe Focus Leak | Article 9: The Requirement Drift

The Focus Leak | Article 8: The Feedback Lag

Engineers are hired to build the right thing the first time, but they are often forced to work in the dark. While the “Review Stall” (Article 7) deals with peer approval, the Feedback Lag deals with the high “Round-Trip Time” (RTT) from stakeholders. The…

Read MoreThe Focus Leak | Article 8: The Feedback Lag

The Focus Leak | Article 7: The Review Stall

Engineers are hired to ship code, but they are often caught in “Human Deadlocks.” While the “Discovery Gap” (Article 6) deals with finding data, the Review Stall deals with the decay of logic while waiting for human approval. The Problem: Human Deadlocks In multi-threaded…

Read MoreThe Focus Leak | Article 7: The Review Stall

The Focus Leak | Article 6: The Discovery Gap

Engineers are hired to apply logic to data, but they often spend half their day simply trying to find the data. While “Tooling Friction” (Article 5) deals with mechanical delays, the Discovery Gap deals with the mental friction of hunting for information. The Problem:…

Read MoreThe Focus Leak | Article 6: The Discovery Gap
Prev
1 … 3 4 5 6 7
Next

Copyright © 2026