The Hiring Leak | Article 0: The Role Spec Leak
I see it all the time: we hire brilliant people, and then… they stall. Not because they aren’t capable, but because the role itself is a fog. Responsibilities are vague. Expectations are assumed. The real problems the team needs solved? No one wrote them down.
I call this the Role Spec Leak.
Hiring Without Clarity
Hiring is treated like a checklist: post a job, review resumes, interview, offer. But the role itself is rarely defined.
Without clarity, everything else is guesswork:
- Resumes are judged against the wrong skills.
- Interviews focus on questions that don’t matter.
- “Culture fit” becomes the fallback metric instead of real impact.
It’s like buying a high-performance engine and dropping it into a car with no steering wheel. The talent is there, but nothing moves in the right direction.
How to Spot a Leaky Role
- Everyone describes the role differently.
- Outcomes aren’t measurable.
- Dependencies aren’t mapped — new hires bump into unseen roadblocks.
- Success is “subjective” rather than tangible.
Even the best candidate will struggle if the system itself is broken.
Fixing the Leak
The solution is simple: define the role as a system, not a title.
- Start with outcomes: What does success look like at 30, 60, 90 days — and at 6 and 12 months?
- Map dependencies: Who does this role interact with? Which systems or teams does it touch?
- Skills vs. behaviors: Focus on what the hire actually needs to accomplish, not just what’s on a resume.
- Clarify decision rights: What can they decide independently? What needs guidance?
A clear spec doesn’t just prevent friction — it makes your hires productive from day one.
💡 Takeaway:
A role without clarity leaks value before a single candidate even starts. Define it. Map it. Make it real. Otherwise, you’re pouring talent into a bucket with holes.